Sd.Kfz. 232 (6 Rad)
Kit #7032 Review by Rob Haelterman

After probing the market with the re-release of the venerable Esci kits, Italeri is slowly expanding its range with its own new releases. This is one of them. It must be said however that Italeri does not envisage competing with the high end of the market and even explicitly markets these kits for the wargaming community. While this means that some kits (e.g. the Sd.Kfz.234 series) can be built with simplified parts or the more detailed ones, it does not mean that these kits are sub-par, as for instance the Hat Armourfast range. They can, by all means, be built into competition models with some loving care, as Simon already pointed out.

Nevertheless, this kit is not without its faults. While Simon discovered that the kit is too wide, I have not measured the overall dimensions as it would be quite hard to rectify, and it seems to capture the overall looks of the vehicle. (See Simon Barnes' preview for more comments and for pictures of the sprues and decals)


1. History and versions

But which vehicle is it ? First recall that the Sd.Kfz.232 is the radio version of the Sd.Kfz.231. But, just telling someone you are building a Sd.kfz.232 won't do. For instance, you had the Sd.KfZ. 232 (6 Rad) and the Sd.KfZ. 232 (8 Rad), but the 6 Rad came in three distinct versions, depending on the chassis: Daimler-Benz, Bussing NAG and Magirus. Of these, Daimler-Benz only built a few and Magirus built the most. I can only assume the Sd.Kfz.232 itself also appeared on all three chassis types.

The two most common types are most easily distinguishable by their fornt fenders: the Magirus having the longest front section. There are numerous other differences, but I don't know them all, but to me it seems that this kit has most of the distinguishing features of a Bussing NAG vehicle.


2. Accuracy

There are some annoying errors / omissions that can be more or less easily rectified :

  • the rear door is missing. Easy to scribe and to add some small hinges (most is hidden by the spare wheel)
  • the rainguard over the rear turret hatch is missing. While I wrote this down early in the construction phase, I only noticed I had forgotten to put it on when writing this review with the kit already painted. D'Oh !
  • the demarcation on the gun mantlet is almost non existent. You might want to scratchbuild this. The next best thing would be to scribe this detail (see the 4-view drawings in the manual). You won't get the depth in this way, but at least it looks like it is there.
  • the nose radiator is ill defined. Scratchbuild new louvers or ignore.
  • the spare wheel at the rear is quite a poor rendition. It is cast together with the rear plate and is slightly smaller than the other wheels. Enhancing the canvas with paper tissue might help, or you can leave it off and build the vehicle pre-1935. In that case you will need more work on the rear door, and leave off the suitcase-shaped spare fuel tank on the left side and the Notek. As I was building this vehicle in a hurry (I wanted to finally finish a kit in less than a year !) I only enhanced the demarcation between the wheel and the rear plate.
  • The tools are very flat.

3. Construction

Building the kit poses no real challenge. Fit of the parts is generally very good with some very minor amount of putty needed here and there. Most of it went to the lower part of the spare wheel which is hollow and extends below the rear plate and the "cheeks" of the turret. The plastic is quite easy to work with and reacts well to MEK. You get some detail on the lower chassis if you want this to be visible. Strangely enough, there is some scribing detail behind the top plate on the nose, as if the person making the master for this kit overdid himself while cutting some parts. It is easy to sand, but strange. The boxes that are integrally molded with the fenders are hollow underneath, so you'd better fill them in. The other boxes have to be glued on, but there are no locating pegs or holes. The gun barrel is not bad, but if you have a spare brass barrel lying around, use it. The nice thing is that Italeri gives you the small details like width indicators, turn indicators, headlights and a very nice Notek, which are sometimes missing in other kits. Be careful with the Notek, as it only appeared early in 1940. The 4 small lights (at least I think they are lights) near the apex of the hull need their shafts cut off, as they were fitted directly to the hull. The rearview mirror on the left width indicator needs modification, as it is a double mirror in the kit. Strangely enough, Italeri got this right on the Sd.Kfz.234, but not in this one. If you want to add the frame antenna, I hope you did not forget to open up the locating holes for the supports. The manual does not mention this, but it would not be a bad idea.

The saddest thing about this kit is that all hatches are closed. Even though I had planned to build this kit OOB, I could not resist to open up the commander's hatch.

While I do not doubt that Italeri will release the Sd.Kfz.231 (6 Rad) in due time, it is only a matter of omitting the frame antenna and adding a small semi-circular anti-aircaft MG mount on the turret. The latter was installed in 1935.


4. Painting

If I can believe my references, none of the painting schemes that Italeri proposes are correct. Risking to become very unpopular in Italy, I arrived at the following conclusions

  1. German army, 2nd Pz.Div., France 1940, overall Schwarzgrau.
    According to the team from Panzer Tracts, the conventional wisdom that German vehicles were overall dark grey in 1940 is flawed. That is, they stayed in 2/3 Schwarzgrau + 1/3 Dunkelbraun until the summer of 1940.
  2. German army, 3rd Pz.Div., France 1940, overall Schwarzgrau.
    Same remark.
  3. German army, unknown unit, Poland 1939, overall Schwarzgrau.
    Same remark, but you should omit the Notek as this only appeared early in 1940
  4. German army, unknown unit on training, Germany 1937, overall Schwarzgrau.
    Same remark about the Notek, but the camo scheme is less clear. Again according to Panzer Tracts, the grey-brown camo scheme appeared in July 1937, BUT... prior to that all AFV were delivered in the 4-color Buntfarbenanstrich. Vehicles in need of repainting got the two-color scheme, and only in November 1938 the order was given to repaint them all. If we accept that all Sd.Kfz.231 and 232 (6Rad) were delivered prior to 1937 [2] , then this would mean that you would actually have the opportunity to have a go at this colorful scheme. Who said early German AFV were boring.


Below is my rendition of the 232, after building and painting it in 4 days, bettering my previous record by 125 days ! Of course, at that point I still needed to touch up the paint job here and there, add the details, and give it a minor nose job, as I rushed my sanding in that area.

The decals are nice. The white crosses really are white, opaque and sharp. Only the yellow unit markings were a bit soft around the edges. It could be just my decal sheet, and I did not care as it imitates the effect of stencil painting. The decals for the licence plates are very nice, even including the official "stamp".
I painted the model in an early war scheme of Panzer Gray (Revell 78) and Dark Brown (Humbrol 98).

5. References:

[1] Die Gepanzerte Radfahrzeuge des Deutschen Heeres 1909-1945, W.J. Spielberger. Band 4 der Reihe "Militärgahrzeuge" , Motorbuch Verlag

[2] Panzer Tracts No. 13 - Panzerspähwagen, by Jentz and Doyle

[3] German Armoured Cars and Reconnaissance Half-tracks 1939-1945, B. Perret, New Vanguard 29, Osprey Publishing

Back to Italeri kit list Back to Home Page
Last updated: 03 November 2010